Download Ebook Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl
So, when you require quickly that book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl, it doesn't have to await some days to get guide Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl You could directly obtain guide to save in your device. Even you enjoy reading this Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl anywhere you have time, you could enjoy it to read Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl It is definitely practical for you that want to obtain the a lot more precious time for reading. Why do not you spend 5 minutes and also spend little cash to get the book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl right here? Never allow the new thing goes away from you.
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl
Download Ebook Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl. Discovering how to have reading behavior resembles learning how to try for eating something that you really don't desire. It will require even more times to help. In addition, it will additionally little bit pressure to serve the food to your mouth and ingest it. Well, as reviewing a publication Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl, occasionally, if you should review something for your new tasks, you will really feel so dizzy of it. Even it is a book like Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl; it will make you feel so bad.
When visiting take the encounter or thoughts kinds others, book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl can be an excellent resource. It's true. You can read this Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl as the resource that can be downloaded right here. The means to download and install is additionally very easy. You could see the web link web page that our company offer and then acquire guide to make an offer. Download and install Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl and also you could put aside in your own device.
Downloading guide Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl in this internet site listings can give you more advantages. It will reveal you the best book collections and also finished collections. Numerous books can be located in this web site. So, this is not just this Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl However, this book is described review because it is a motivating publication to give you a lot more possibility to get experiences and also ideas. This is easy, review the soft file of the book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl as well as you get it.
Your perception of this publication Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl will lead you to obtain what you precisely require. As one of the motivating books, this book will supply the visibility of this leaded Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl to accumulate. Even it is juts soft documents; it can be your collective file in device as well as various other device. The crucial is that use this soft documents book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl to read as well as take the advantages. It is just what we indicate as book Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis And A Review Of The Evidence, By Paul E Meehl will certainly boost your ideas as well as mind. After that, checking out publication will additionally enhance your life high quality much better by taking good action in balanced.
Clinical versus Statistical Prediction is Paul Meehl's famous examination of benefits and disutilities related to the different ways of combining information to make predictions. It is a clarifying analysis as relevant today as when it first appeared.
A major methodological problem for clinical psychology concerns the relation between clinical and actuarial methods of arriving at diagnoses and predicting behavior. Without prejudging the question as to whether these methods are fundamentally different, we can at least set forth the obvious distinctions between them in practical applications. The problem is to predict how a person is going to behave: What is the most accurate way to go about this task?
Clinical versus Statistical Prediction offers a penetrating and thorough look at the pros and cons of human judgment versus actuarial integration of information as applied to the prediction problem. Widely considered the leading text on the subject, Paul Meehl's landmark analysis is reprinted here in its entirety, including his updated preface written forty-two years after the first publication of the book.
This classic work is a must-have for students and practitioners interested in better understanding human behavior, for anyone wanting to make the most accurate decisions from all sorts of data, and for those interested in the ethics and intricacies of prediction. As Meehl puts it, "When one is dealing with human lives and life opportunities, it is immoral to adopt a mode of decision-making which has been demonstrated repeatedly to be either inferior in success rate or, when equal, costlier to the client or the taxpayer."
- Sales Rank: #3106600 in Books
- Published on: 2015-09-10
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.25" h x .44" w x 7.52" l, 1.10 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 164 pages
Most helpful customer reviews
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful.
Definitive treatment of clinical prediction
By J. Ruscio
More than half a century after its original publication in 1954, this remains the most important scholarly work on this subject. As Meehl noted in this monograph and elsewhere, he most emphatically was not comparing different ways of gathering information (e.g., tests vs. interviews). Rather, he was comparing different ways of integrating whatever information has been gathered to make the most valid predictions possible, and thereby to use the most ethically defensible decision-making procedure. One could gather the information through tests (standardized, projective, etc.), interviews (structured, unstructured, or semi-structured), archival records (school, medical, criminal, etc.), informants (family, coworkers, etc.), and a number of other ways.
Meehl's analysis dealt with how all of this information is combined. Should we do it in our heads, or should we use a mechanical decision aid, such as an equation or an actuarial table? He presented a sophisticated analysis of the task and considered conditions that might favor each approach. In one chapter, he reviewed the available empirical data, but this is not the focal point of this monograph.
An article by Grove and Meehl (1996) provides an excellent treatment of objections to mechanical decision aids, with persuasive rebuttals for each, and a meta-analysis by Grove et al (2000) provide a quantitative review of the empirical literature on the subject, including 136 studies that met fairly strict inclusion criteria (in contrast to the 20 studies that were available to Meehl for review in 1954).
Meehl's original conclusion that mechanical decision aids achieve validity rates equal or superior to those of experts exercising their unaided judgment has stood the test of time and is now supported by such a large and diverse array of studies that an impartial reader can reasonably conclude that this "controversy" has been settled.
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful.
Importance of Meehl's "little book"
By Loyd
This is probably one of the most important books ever written (early 50's), and as a result widely ignored by fields that relied (or rely) upon subjective judgements such as medicine. The last time I read anything about this issue, there had not been one study that contradicted Meehl's basic findings (see for example, work by Hastie and Dawes). Yet, irrational decision making is pervasive. Years ago I went through medical school and a psychiatry residency without one reference to this book. I had to find this on my own, and fortunately did so in the late 70's. This and issues such as construct validity, improper linear models, and at least the idea of Bayesian statistics got me into a lot of trouble with my fellow workers in mental health who made totally irrational clinical decisions seriously harming many people (I worked in public mental health centers for the most part); so ultimately Meehl was responsible for my ending a very frustrating career in public psychiatry. Long story. People always tell me I should write a book. Of all the things I studied for many years, Meehl was the foundation.
14 of 19 people found the following review helpful.
An analysis of interviews VS psychological tests
By Amazon Customer
Despite the ago of this book (written around 1954 as an expansion of lectures given in the years 1947-1950, fifth printing (unchanged) in 1963), the points raised by Paul Meehl remain current.
Paul Meehl asks himself the question what "how can we predict how a person is going to behave?". He distinguishes 2 main approaches: clinical interviews VS statistics (psychometric tests) and discusses the pros and cons of both approaches.
For decades psychologists have been struggling between the use of tests (statistics) and (clinical) interviews. I ran into the problem myself when I did a Whiplash study in 1999 and found that many doctors made clear mistakes during the patient's LAB Profile interviews, to such an extend that the produced data was unreliable for further research! Since then, I reluctantly moved over to the testing side and co-developed the iWAM test (see jobEQ.com), but I recommend complementing tests with structured follow up interviews to check the validity of the test answers.
One of his main points pro testing is that "Every hour a clinician spends in thinking and talking about whom to treat, and how and how long, is being subtracted from the available pool of therapeutic time itself." The main counter argument of a clinician will be that every individual is a separate case and thus becomes hard to find in the numbers.
In global, one can say that Meehl holds a quite impartial point of view and tries to present approaches in a factual manner, trying to bring them together. A slight bias towards testing may be expected, given that Paul Meehl was a professor of Psychology and psychiatry at the University of Minnesota and also wrote a book on the clinical use of MMPI.
Complementary books you may what to read are "Psychological testing" by Kaplan & Saccuzzo (2001) and "How to think straight about psychology" by Stanovich, 2001
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl PDF
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl EPub
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl Doc
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl iBooks
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl rtf
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl Mobipocket
Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence, by Paul E Meehl Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar